![]() Plaintiff seeks injunctive and monetary relief for these violations under 42 U.S.C. §§ 960.204(c) (1), 960.205(a)) and (C) as violating the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it creates an irrebuttable presumption. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") regulations prohibiting categorical limitations in tenant selection criteria (24 C.F.R. Housing Act of 1937 (B) as violating the U.S. Plaintiff challenges RHA's policy of requiring a judicial decree on three grounds : (A) as contravening the purpose of the U.S. ![]() Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Motion to Dismiss, are now before the court. On December 23, 1991, plaintiffs filed this action challenging a policy of the Reading Housing Authority ("RHA") that requires applicants for public housing under the age of eighteen (18) to provide a judicial decree of emancipation as a condition of admission. ![]() *1324 *1325 Peter Zurflieh, Harrisburg, PA, for plaintiff.Įdwin L. Luckey, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Reading Housing Authority, Defendants. The READING HOUSING AUTHORITY and Daniel F. Carmen RIVERA, on behalf of herself and her minor child, Plaintiffs,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |